Let us know about free updates
Simply sign up for Work & Careers Myft Digest and it will be delivered directly to your inbox.
Employment law experts say the cost of ageism for employers is high.
Law firm Fox & Partners says the average compensation given in successful age discrimination cases rose 624% between 2022 and 23, to £103,000. The equivalent of the previous year was £14,000.
This jump is spurred by high value cases involving senior experts. Age and experience are people who mean the influence of the company, even if it sometimes causes problems.
In one well-known case, a senior executive fired from Vesuvius, the engineering company of FTSE 250, was awarded £3.2 million for age discrimination last year. Before showing him the door, his boss delivered a “45-minute lecture,” called “an “old fossils” who didn’t know how to deal with millennials.”
Such issues can become more common as the world population ages. By 2050, approximately one-quarter of the OECD’s population will be over 65 years old.
Cases like “fossils” underscore the risks of ignoring potential age discrimination, according to Ivor Adair, a partner at Fox & Partners. “There’s a lot of heads in the sand (at that point) with the aging workforce and succession plans.” Adair said the high value of the award should serve as a warning to employers of the risk of discrimination against senior staff. Adair says there is.
The company recently received an “increase in advanced users” asking about ageism. Most people say redundancy is a “pretty” to want to hire “young people.”
However, taking action on alleged age discrimination is not easy. “Age is unique,” says Adair, amidst her protected traits. The decision to retire an elderly worker is when it is a proportional way to achieve a legitimate objective, but if the objective has social policy goals such as promoting intergenerational equity. can only be justified.
It is a way for professional service companies to justify a partner’s permanent retirement age, with reasons to promote access to partnerships for younger workers. However, meeting the requirements for justification is not easy. Employers must show that they balance the interests of older workers they want to remain with the effects of forced retirement on them, Adair adds. Many older workers may argue that layoffs have actually ended their careers, as it is difficult to find jobs at their age at the same level.
Most cases are resolved early before reaching court. The increase in discrimination compensation is based on just 12 cases in the year ending in 2023. Emily Andrews is the assistant director of work at the Aging Center, and sees it as a poor measure of “ageism at work.” “It takes an incredible amount of time.”
“Ageism is more extensive than these few people show. Only a small minority with a substantial resource can pursue and even fewer successes,” she adds.
Instead of over litigation, employers need to focus on making the most of multi-generational teams, Andrews focuses on filling the skills and labor shortages by removing hiring and training barriers. You need to hit it. “The multi-sei team is the most productive and innovative,” she says. Companies can also consider training line managers’ consideration of job design, such as flexible working patterns.
Lyndsey Simpson, CEO of 55/Redefined, says it is a consulting company that helps the organization recruit and maintain older workers. “The hiring costs around $4,000 per job, and you can save money by keeping loyal and experienced employees. Plus, as AI grows, soft skills and emotional intelligence are invaluable. And the elderly have these in spades. Many have witnessed the first human land of the moon, and all have seen the invention of the internet. They experience constant change It is built for adaptability.”
A multi-generational workforce is the future. “For the first time, five generations are working together.” This diversity means employers need to rethink their workplace policies. For example, by expanding returners and flexible work programs beyond the parents of young children.
As Simpson points out, diversity is probably the wrong prism for looking at older workers.
